|

Due to a large forested land base and
difficult access, often tree lists are not available for every stand.
However, aerial
information is often available for every polygon of land in BC. UBC
researchers have examined the potential for using aerial information to
estimate tree lists where they are not available.
The
application of Nearest Neighbour (closeness in auxilliary variables
rather than by spatial location) methods to impute ground information
from aerial data was demonstrated for two types of tree lists, a
tree-by-tree list of live trees by species and diameter, and a
list of wildlife trees defined as dead or recently dead and fallen
trees, grouped into two size classes and two species groups, and for
summary variables (e.g, basal area per ha and volume per ha).
For each type of tree list, different nearest
neighbour approaches
were tested by varying the distance metric used and the number of
neighbours used to provide and estimate. Selecting
the more than one nearest neighbour, weighting the values, and
assigning these to
the target polygons often yielded better results than using a single
neighbour or using an unweighted average of the closest neighbours.
REPORTS,
PUBLICATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS:
Temesgen, H., V.M. LeMay, K.L. Froese,
and P.L.
Marshall. 2003. Imputing tree-lists from aerial attributes
for complex stands of south-eastern
British Columbia. For.
Ecol. & Manage. 177: 277-285.
Possible
Approaches for Relating Growth and Yield Models to Aerial Information.
Part I--Literature Review and Data Sources
Possible
Approaches for Relating Growth and Yield Models to Aerial Information.
Part II--Example Using Existing Audit Data
[Regeneration
Establishment] [Predicting Tree Lists] [Small Tree Height Growth]
[Large Tree Height Growth]
[Large Tree Diameter Increment] [Live Crown] [Mortality]
|